|
Economic Snapshots:
-
Unemployment 4.6% (National)
-
New Jobs
for December 167,000
-
Unemployment 5.3% (KC Metro)
-
Housing
Permits down this month
Quick Facts – KC
Metro Area
-
Air
Freight 21 million pounds moved through KCI Airport
-
Housing
Permits in November – 760 units
-
Help
Wanted down 70% compared to same time last year
-
Passenger Traffic moving through KCI November 2005-800,000 people
November 2006-880,000 people.
Meetings
and Presentations
–
I am
happy to speak on the state of the real estate industry and business
economics to any group or organization that you may be a part of. All
this knowledge free of charge, happy to share my thoughts and
insights. If you would like to book a time with me please contact me
via e-mail or phone and let me know the date and time of your event. I
will make myself available schedule permitting.
DIESEL PRICING
U.S. Weekly Average
Per Gallon
11-20-06 - $2.553
11-27-06 - $2.567
12-04-06 - $2.618
KC Local Business Owners
by Age
Under
25 - 1%
25 to
34 - 8%
35 to
44 - 24%
45 to
54 - 32%
55 to
64 - 21%
65 &
over – 10%
Snapshot – Manufacturing
Sector
Cost
breakdown at the pump for diesel fuel
Taxes
– 19%
Distribution/Marketing – 15%
Refining – 14%
Crude
Oil – 52%
|
This
Newsletter is being provided to you free of charge by Paul Licausi,
President of LS Commercial Real Estate.
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!!
CLOSE OUT 2006 START 2007 WHAT TO EXPECT IN THE NEW YEAR
Ever been on an indoor roller coaster? If not, here is what happens,
typically it is dark and you are just along for the ride not knowing
which direction you will go next, up or down or some other way. The
bottom line is you are just along for the ride and doing your best to
anticipate the next move so that you can hang on and not fall off the
ride. In preparing to write this newsletter, I thought, what best
describes this economy over the last year and I wanted to find a
unique analogy for comparison ala the indoor roller coaster.
The
economy started the year on fire, remember all the hoopla, monthly job
growth was off the chart, consumer spending was strong and we had no
signs of any cracks in the economic armor. Early in the year we all
got on the indoor roller coaster but the lights were on, we could see
where we were going and there were only minor ups and downs on the
ride. Midway through the year, energy prices started to get our
attention, interest rates continued upward, the housing sector started
to turn downward and then the coaster operator turned the lights off
and the ups and downs started getting much more evident. Most
importantly, we all lost the ability to see what was up ahead. We
could only sit and hang on and do our best to anticipate the next move
of the coaster. For me; that pretty much summed up the last half of
2006, although there was an abundance of economic data out there, it
was very difficult to anticipate where the economy was really heading.
It was clear that energy prices were not coming down as drastically as
I had thought, I really believed that oil pricing would be much closer
to $50 per barrel, but not so. The monthly new job creation was pretty
much on track as I expected with the exception of October and the
manufacturing sector weakened much quicker than I expected.
Was
2006 a good year, really depends on the sector of the economy you
operate in, I believe on average that overall it was a positive year
for most industries. Above average growth the first half of the year
was trimmed by the sluggishness in the second half of the year, but
overall most of us should have seen an overall positive year for 2006.
What lies ahead for 2007, slower but steady growth. It is unlikely
that we will see GDP growth over 3%. Manufacturing will continue to be
slower and there is a real possibility that we will see several months
of contraction in this sector. Unemployment will trend upward, we
should see the unemployment rate remain closer to 5% throughout the
year and new job creation will start to trend downward with a monthly
average of less than 100,000 new jobs created monthly.
My
predictions here do not appear to be very positive, but it all depends
on how you look at it. I do consider my predictions here to be
positive, even though I am calling for slower growth; nonetheless I am
still calling for growth. Higher unemployment, yes, comparative to
2006 levels, but still low compared to historic levels and finally
lower new job creation. Again, the key word here is lower which still
indicates new jobs will be created monthly just at a slower pace
compared to 2006 levels. This is probably the best outlook we could
hope for during 2007. It is indicative of the coveted “soft landing”
the Federal Reserve wanted to achieve for the economy and if my
numbers hold up it will be a moderate slow down in the economy to tame
inflation but with the economy growing. Better than a recession, which
is still a possibility but albeit a small one at this point.
Take a look at some key economic indicators over the next couple of
months; PMI index (manufacturing sector), unemployment, new jobs
creation and GDP. Based on what these indicators show over the next
couple of months will be a precursor to what we can expect over the
first half of 2007.
Fed Watch
Not
much activity from the Fed over the last couple of months. During the
last Federal Reserve meeting in December the fed held interest rates
in check and noted that inflation pressures were subsiding and that
the economy continued to slow and that no action was needed at this
point to tip the scales one way or the other. Typically, you have a
few Fed Governors speaking about the economy but there has been very
little activity by any of these folks and I think it must be a
self-imposed quite period to let the markets adjust to the new year.
The only Fed comments came from the Vice Chairman who is very
influential, he indicated that the Fed was content with current
economic conditions, they continue to watch the housing market closely
and the energy markets, he felt that these two sectors could still see
some volatility and that could put pressure back on the economy. He
commented that the Fed did not see any need to intervene in the
markets either raising or lowering interest rates and would look at
more data as the new year got started.
The
consensus by several leading economists has been that the probability
the Fed would lower rates in the first quarter of 2007 was at 50%.
Information I have seen over the last month shows that this position
has changed dramatically and that the probability of rate decease in
the first quarter of 2007 is now at 14%. Further, the economist group
that I put the most stock in, who is based in St. Louis, recently
issued a statement indicating that they feel the Fed will leave
interest rates at the current level during all of 2007. Am I on board
with this predication, no, I do believe that the Fed will have to take
some action during the year and decrease interest rates. The economy
will need the boost at some point during the year, it is more likely,
in my opinion; that this will occur in mid summer of 2007.
The
next Federal Reserve meeting will be in late January and the Fed will
be giving guidance for the remainder of first quarter at that time. Be
sure and watch the news at the end of this month so that you can be
aware of their comments. Otherwise, looks like rates will remain
stable for the first half of 2007.
Industry Alert Corner
Industry in the
spot light this month, Rail Intermodal Containers.
I am sure you
have heard the news about BNSF constructing a major rail hub in
Gardner, Kansas. This is a big deal for KC; the major railroads have
been making significant investments in selected areas throughout the
country constructing these rail hubs. The key to these sites is what
they are designed for, they are not an A-typical rail hub which is a
centralized yard for trains to come in and where cars are switched out
and sent to the end user. These rail hubs are for container traffic.
This is the fastest growing segment of the railroad business,
transporting overseas containers from the costal ports to inland
staging areas. This business is growing at a tremendous pace, inbound
overseas containers coming into the U.S. is growing at a pace that the
ports cannot keep up with. Most of the coastal ports are landlocked
and they cannot be expanded which has put significant pressure on the
amount of inbound container traffic they can handle. The result is an
increase is the amount of time a ship must wait before it can be
unloaded. The ports have been working with the railroads to increase
the amount of container traffic they handle which will allow the ports
to decrease wait times for inbound ships trying to get their loads
into the port. The BNSF facility that will be constructed in Gardner
will act as an inland port. Containers will now go from the ship to
the rail and then to one of the railroads inland ports. The containers
will be offloaded from the train and then onto a truck chassis and
delivered to a sorting warehouse located close by the rail facility.
The decision by
BNSF to locate this type of facility in the KC metro area (Gardner) is
big. This facility will quickly generate a whole host of business
activity on the southern part of the metro area. You will see an
inflow of major corporations who will locate facilities in this market
and will be working in conjunction with the BNSF facility.
It is amazing to
see how much the container traffic at the ports has increased with no
sign of slowing down. This will continue to push the activity level
upward at these inland ports operated by the railroads. Look for great
things to happen as the BNSF facility comes on line. You need to take
a hard look at this project and understand how this facility will
operate and how your business can service the companies that will be
coming to town to utilize the rail facility. This will be a major
business center and the early bird in this process will most certainly
get the worm.
If you want more
information on his project or have questions give me a call I am happy
to give you input.
Manufacturing Sector
The
manufacturing sector reversed course again during December, with a one
month contraction in November, the sector bounced back in December
with an impressive rebound in activity posting a index reading of 51.4
which is a 1.9 point increase over the November index reading.
What happened? There was a significant increase in new orders during
December; I attribute this to late surge in consumer spending for the
holiday season. As I mentioned in the last newsletter, I have been
watching consumer spending throughout the holiday season and going
into the last part of the holiday season a survey showed that only 50%
of the consumers had completed their shopping. It appears that they
got busy during December and there was a surge of spending towards the
end of the season which pushed new life back into this sector.
Given this spurt of activity, do start cheering yet. I still believe
that we will see the index reading hover in a range from 48 to 52 over
the next few months. I revised my index prediction in last month’s
newsletter to 45 to 49 based upon the latest information I had on
forecasted GDP growth. New GDP forecast for first half of 2007 have
revised the GDP upward somewhat so this should give the manufacturing
sector a reasonable chance of maintaining a slight expansion. The key
will be consumer spending, energy costs and how quickly the housing
market stabilizes. Based on what I have seen so far, consumer spending
will continue to remain around the historical average or slightly
below that, energy prices will continue to come down with oil prices
stabilizing around $50 per barrel and the housing market should hit
bottom sometime in the 1st quarter of 2007. That should be
the end of the downward cycle for the housing sector and we should see
an upward trend sometime late 2nd or 3rd quarter
of 2007. I do not expect the housing sector to return with all the
fanfare as before, rather a slow methodical upward pace.
What to expect as we start 2007, very slow growth in the manufacturing
sector. It will interesting, to see if the sector can continue the
gains they had in December. All of the major indicators were up, New
Orders, Production, Employment and Supplier Deliveries were all up
significantly. Inventories were down slightly and Backlog Orders were
down slightly. I always like to see the indicators this way,
typically, good news follows for the next couple of months. However,
Backlog Orders were down which means the order pipeline was not as
robust. One offset for this was the decline in inventories, the
manufacturers will need to maintain the production level during the
next few months to replenish inventories so that will keep the sector
moving forward. Look for more of the same slow methodical growth
during the 1st quarter of 2007. By the way, this is not a
bad thing; the key here is growth and I believe it is better to have a
prolonged period of slow methodical growth then if the sector was on
fire moving upward quickly. It is much easier for all of us to adjust
and keep pace with a prolonged period of methodical growth.
ENERGY SECTOR SPOTLIGHT
I
have noticed more press lately on the commodity players in the oil
futures market. Lots of crying about how they continue to lose money
and how hard it is to play in the oil futures commodity market.
Interestingly, I did not hear any of this concern over the last year
when they were cutting a fat hog playing in this market, while the
consumer was paying dearly for gasoline and diesel fuel. The last
article I read, highlighted the costs to hold a futures position in
oil, and yes it is expensive. The problem for these people is that the
speculators who have been propping up the market are leaving the oil
futures commodity market in droves, leaving no one to support the
prices. As I have stated in several past newsletters, when these
people leave the market oil will start coming down. Well get ready, it
appears that the big hedge fund and equity fund players are
reallocating their investment structure to significantly reduce their
investment in the energy futures market. As these big boys leave the
market, support for oil commodity prices will soften. This should
allow for oil prices to move downward and hopefully gasoline and
diesel to follow. I am not convinced that we will see oil drop below
$50 per barrel in the short term; it appears the producers are trying
to organize to support the price at that level. Long term, jury is out
of pricing. I have seen data supporting pricing for oil in a range
from $20 per barrel to $100 per barrel. Too many factors to contend
with (geopolitical, supply, weather, etc.) we will all need to take a
wait and see approach as the year unfolds. Nonetheless, I do expect
lower energy prices in 2007 as compared to 2006.
By
the way, the OPEC boys finally conceded that it was really difficult
to enforce the reduction in production they called for; greed wins out
on this one. |
|
 
|
KC INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE UPDATE
2006 ended on a positive note for the overall industrial real estate
market in KC. Another strong year for the market, vacancy levels
continue to trend downward ending the year at 8%. Historically, an 8%
vacancy rate is about as low as we have seen in this market for some
time. Lease rates did trend upward slightly and inventory levels of
existing properties being offered for sale or lease remained tight.
What will 2007 bring; more industrial building development. We will
see an increase in bulk warehouse space. There are new buildings that
will be coming on line in Lee’s Summit and KC North areas on the
Missouri side, on the Kansas side new buildings will be coming on line
in Lenexa, Shawnee, Olathe, KC, KS and Gardner. Most will be a-typical
for the KC market, 50,000 to 100,000 square feet, 24-30 foot ceiling
height and typical space sizes of 20,000 square feet and up. Pricing
on these buildings will be in the $4.00 per square foot range with a
NNN lease structure. Many developers are trying to push this type of
lease structure in KC (which is common in most major markets), which
is different from a modified gross industrial lease structure that is
most common in the KC market. The NNN lease structure has a set base
rent amount ($4.00 psf) plus the tenant will pay NNN charges, which
consist of Real Estate taxes, Building Insurance and Common Area
Maintenance thus making up the three parts to the NNN. The Tenant will
pay an estimated amount monthly for all three of these cost components
as additional rent on top of the base rent. At the end of a calendar
year, these three cost components are reconciled for actual costs and
the NNN estimated charges are adjusted for the coming year based upon
the actual costs for the previous year. This structure is different
from the standard lease type we see in this market, modified gross
industrial leases are most common, in this lease structure the tenant
pays a fixed base lease rate which includes the base year for Real
Estate Taxes and Building Insurance, in addition to that the Tenant
pays a separate charge for Common Area Maintenance. At the end of a
calendar year, if the Taxes and/or Insurance have increased over the
base year amount (which is established at the time the tenant takes
occupancy), the tenant will pay to landlord the increased amount as
additional rent. The Common Area Maintenance is an estimated amount
paid monthly which is reconciled at the end of each calendar year and
the new year estimated monthly payment amount is based the actual
costs of the previous year. You will continue to see a move towards
the NNN lease structure for new buildings; older buildings will remain
on a modified gross industrial lease structure.
During the coming year, expect inventory levels to remain tight and
there will continue to be an upward movement in lease rates. This
should not deter you from getting out there and moving forward on
space to accommodate your business activity. You will still be able to
find selected incentives (some free rent, build out allowance, etc.)
for properties that are older. Do not expect much of any incentives
for the newer properties; the developers just cannot afford to extend
any. If you are interested in buying a building, pricing has not
softened any, in fact pricing has continued to increase. On older
facilities that typically sold in the mid $30 per square foot dollar
range over the last 12 months now are selling over $40 per square
foot. Do not look for any downward movement in pricing this year. The
good news if you are thinking about purchasing a building, interest
rates should remain stable during 2007 so the cost of capital should
not increase above the current level.
COMPANIES
MOVING IN THE MARKET
If you are
interested in buying, selling a building or need to lease space call
me and I will provide detailed market information to you and assist
you in completing the transaction. Also, if you are interested in
selling your building now is a good time and I can assist you in
establishing market value for your building and selling your building
for you. Thank you for your time and I hope this information has been
helpful. |